Site.PalmersComputingScale1846 History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup - Cancel

11 May 2014 by Jim Falk -
Changed line 18 from:

In 1909 Florian Cajori1 described these two instruments as follows:

to:

In 1909 Florian Cajori2 described the components from which this instrument was developed as follows:

11 May 2014 by Jim Falk -
Changed line 18 from:

Cajori3 describes these two instruments as follows:

to:

In 1909 Florian Cajori4 described these two instruments as follows:

11 May 2014 by Jim Falk -
Changed line 18 from:

Cajori5 describes these two instruments as follows:

to:

Cajori6 describes these two instruments as follows:

11 May 2014 by Jim Falk -
Changed line 18 from:

Cajori7 describes these two instruments as follows:

to:

Cajori8 describes these two instruments as follows:

11 May 2014 by Jim Falk -
Added lines 17-25:

Cajori9 describes these two instruments as follows:

80. J. Fuller’s Computing Telegraph.

[This instrument consists of a “Time Telegraph,” de-signed by Fuller, which he added to or united with Aaron Palmer’s “Computing Scale.” The “Time Telegraph” was a non-logarithmic circular scale for determining the number of days between given dates. See Improvement to Palmer’s Endless Self-Computing Scale and Key; with a Time Telegraph, making, by uniting the two, a Computing Telegraph. By John E. Fuller, New York, 1846. See also the Colorado College Publication, Engineering Series, Vol. I, No. 7 (1909).]

81. J. Fuller’s Telegraph Computer.

[Telegraphic Computer, a most wonderful and extraordinary instrument, by which business questions, of every possible variety, are instantly performed; a safe and speedy check to avoid vexatious errors, affording at the same time a greater amount of practical business knowledge than can be obtained for ten times the cost of this work. Sold only by subscription. John Fuller, New York (about 1860). Cited by Favaro, op. cit., p. 510. A circular slide rule.]
30 July 2013 by 58.6.241.7 -
30 July 2013 by 58.6.241.7 -
Changed line 3 from:

http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PalmerCS.jpg

to:

http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PalmerCS1.jpg

30 July 2013 by 58.6.241.7 -
Changed line 3 from:

http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/Palmer1.jpg

to:

http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PalmerCS.jpg

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed line 16 from:

Condition is remarkably good with the leather bound sides only slightly marred and the red still bright. The metal control hole is only slightly tarnished. The circular scales both move freely. Whilst there is some discoloration to the faces every number and all instructions printed on both sides are very readable.

to:

Condition is good with the leather bound sides only slightly marred and the red still bright. The metal control hole is slightly tarnished. The circular scales both move freely. Whilst there is some discoloration to the faces every number and all instructions printed on both sides are very readable.

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed line 12 from:
Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations”10.
to:
Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations”11.
10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed lines 9-13 from:

The scale is described by Hook and Norman as:

Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846], quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S. Stoddard, 1842).12
to:

The scale is described by Hook and Norman13 as:

Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations”14.
10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Deleted lines 8-9:

The instrument is engraved volvelle (by George G. Smith) mounted on heavy cardboard with edges bound with gilt leather strips and is 11” square. It represents one of the earliest applications of the words “computing” to an instrument. At the time a computer usually referred to a person employed to do calculation.

Added lines 14-15:

The instrument is engraved volvelle (by George G. Smith) mounted on heavy cardboard with edges bound with gilt leather strips and is 11” square. It represents one of the earliest applications of the words “computing” to an instrument. At the time a computer usually referred to a person employed to do calculation.

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed lines 5-10 from:

Palmer’s Computing Scale on one side with a patent date of 1843 entered by Aaron Palmer of the clerks Office, Boston Mass., as improved by Professor Fuller with scales for percentages, monetary transactions and interest.

Fuller’s Time Telegraph on the other side with a patent date of 1845, Boston, Mass., enabling the calculation of the number of days, weeks, or months to be determined between two given dates without calculations

Engraved volvelle (by George G. Smith) mounted on heavy cardboard, edges bound with gilt leather strips. 11” SQUARE

to:

This is issue 4 of the Palmer’s Computing Scale and bearing the inscription “Improved by Fuller” on one side. The original patent date was 1843 entered by Aaron Palmer of the clerks Office, Boston Mass.. But the Patent was purchased by Professor Fuller and improved by him. The Computing Scale bears scales for percentages, monetary transactions and interest.

Fuller’s Time Telegraph on the other side has a patent date of 1845, Boston, Mass. It enables the calculation of the number of days, weeks, or months to be determined between two given dates without calculations.

The instrument is engraved volvelle (by George G. Smith) mounted on heavy cardboard with edges bound with gilt leather strips and is 11” square. It represents one of the earliest applications of the words “computing” to an instrument. At the time a computer usually referred to a person employed to do calculation.

Added lines 23-26:
  • Bobby Feazel, “Palmer’s Computing Scale”, Journal of the Oughtred Society, vol 3, no. 1, March 1994, p. 9.
  • Bobby Feazel, “Palmer’s Computing Scale - Revisited”, Journal of the Oughtred Society, vol 4, no. 1, March, 1995, p. 5.
10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed line 1 from:

(:title ~1846: Palmer's Computing Scale and Fuller's Time Telegraph:)

to:

(:title 1847: Palmer's Computing Scale and Fuller's Time Telegraph:)

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed line 14 from:
Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846], quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S. Stoddard, 1842).15
to:
Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846], quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S. Stoddard, 1842).16
10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed line 11 from:

The sclae is described in by Hook et al as:

to:

The scale is described by Hook and Norman as:

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Added lines 18-22:

References

  • John E. Fuller, Key to Palmer’s Computing Scale: Improvement to Palmer’s Endless Self-Computing Scale and Key, New York, 1846.
10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Changed lines 11-13 from:

Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846], quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S. Stoddard, 1842).

Condition is remarkably good with the leather bound sides only slightly marred and the red still bright. The metal control hole is only slightly tarnished. The circular scales both move freely. Whilst there is some discoloration to the faces every number and all instructions printed on both sides are very readable.

to:

The sclae is described in by Hook et al as:

Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846], quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S. Stoddard, 1842).17

Condition is remarkably good with the leather bound sides only slightly marred and the red still bright. The metal control hole is only slightly tarnished. The circular scales both move freely. Whilst there is some discoloration to the faces every number and all instructions printed on both sides are very readable.

 

1 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. 47. (↑)

2 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. 47. (↑)

3 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. 47. (↑)

4 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. 47. (↑)

5 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. (↑)

6 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. 47. (↑)

7 Florian Cajori, “The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule”, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. (↑)

8 Florian Cajori, The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. (↑)

9 Florian Cajori, “The History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule”, Engineering news publishing Company, USA, 1909, p. (↑)

10 see Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph, 1846, above. (↑)

11 see Fuller, Key to Palmer’s Computing Scale, 1846, above. (↑)

12 Diana H. Hook and Jeremy M. Norman, Origins of Cyberspace: : A Library on the History of Computing and Computer-Related Telecommunications, Norman Publishing, 2002, pp. 269–70. (↑)

13 Diana H. Hook and Jeremy M. Norman, Origins of Cyberspace: : A Library on the History of Computing and Computer-Related Telecommunications, Norman Publishing, 2002, pp. 269–70. (↑)

14 see Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph, 1846, above. (↑)

15 Diana H. Hook and Jeremy M. Norman, “Origins of Cyberspace: : A Library on the History of Computing and Computer-Related Telecommunications, Norman Publishing, 2002, pp. 269–70. (↑)

16 Diana H. Hook and Jeremy M. Norman, Origins of Cyberspace: : A Library on the History of Computing and Computer-Related Telecommunications, Norman Publishing, 2002, pp. 269–70. (↑)

17 Diana H. Hook and Jeremy M. Norman, “Origins of Cyberspace: : A Library on the History of Computing and Computer-Related Telecommunications, Norman Publishing, 2002, pp. 269–70. (↑)

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Added lines 1-2:

(:title ~1846: Palmer's Computing Scale and Fuller's Time Telegraph:)

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Added line 1:

http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/Palmer1.jpg

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Deleted line 1:
Changed line 8 from:
Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for
 an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in
 Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be
 produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a
 limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American
 public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind,
 by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered
 computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846],
 quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that
 Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing
 its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S.
 Stoddard, 1842). 
to:

Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind, by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846], quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S. Stoddard, 1842).

10 November 2012 by 58.96.77.111 -
Added lines 1-11:

Palmer’s Computing Scale on one side with a patent date of 1843 entered by Aaron Palmer of the clerks Office, Boston Mass., as improved by Professor Fuller with scales for percentages, monetary transactions and interest.

Fuller’s Time Telegraph on the other side with a patent date of 1845, Boston, Mass., enabling the calculation of the number of days, weeks, or months to be determined between two given dates without calculations

Engraved volvelle (by George G. Smith) mounted on heavy cardboard, edges bound with gilt leather strips. 11” SQUARE

Palmer and the engraver George Smith began working on their design for
 an “endless computing scale” in early 1841. It was copyrighted in
 Boston in late 1843, and versions of the device continued to be
 produced until at least 1852. Palmer’s slide rule enjoyed only a
 limited success, largely because of poor marketing and the American
 public’s fear that use of the device “[would] tend to weaken the mind,
 by causing it to rely upon mere mechanism to make its numbered
 computations” (Fuller, Key to Fuller’s Computing Telegraph [1846],
 quoted in Feazel 1994, 15). Karpinski 1940, 439, points out that
 Palmer published A key to the endless self-computing scale, showing
 its application to the different rules of arithmetic (Rochester: P.S.
 Stoddard, 1842). 

Condition is remarkably good with the leather bound sides only slightly marred and the red still bright. The metal control hole is only slightly tarnished. The circular scales both move freely. Whilst there is some discoloration to the faces every number and all instructions printed on both sides are very readable.


Page last modified on 11 May 2014