Site.Introduction History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup - Cancel
Welcome to things-that-count.net. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”1) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments. TEST
Welcome to things-that-count.net. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”2) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.net. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”3) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.net. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”4) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments. TEST
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg
(Pascaline “1652” - working exemplar - - collection Calculant)
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg
(Replica Pascaline “1652” - collection Calculant)
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg
(Pascaline “1652” - working exemplar - collection Calculant)
But the same is true of invention. At different times and in different cultures there have been quite different views taken on the value of change, and thus invention. At some points in history the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). A other times or places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do it. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. This is as true in mathematics as in other areas of human activity.
But the same is true of invention. At different times and in different cultures there have been quite different views taken on the value of change, and thus invention. At some points in history the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). At other times or places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do it. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. This is as true in mathematics as in other areas of human activity.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”5) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.net. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”6) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
(:description A site dealing with the history of calculators and calculating technology:)
(:description A site dealing with the history of counting, history of calculators, and history of calculating technology:)
(:description A site dealing with the history of calculators and calculating technology:)
The objects (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)in “collection Calculant”(:ifend:) described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (which are described in more detail in an accompanying web site - “things-that-count.com”)7. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”8(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)in “collection Calculant”(:ifend:) described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (which are described in more detail in an accompanying web site - “things-that-count.com”)9. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”10(:ifend:) The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
(:keywords history, calculators, rechemaschine, rechenschieber, slide rule, Babylonia, Summeria, Ancient Rome, Ancient Greece, Ancient China, France, Germany, renaissance, Caculatrice, Pascal, Leibnitz, mathematics, arithmetic, Napier, Neper, Briggs, computer, social history, calculator, adding machine, mathematical instruments, Hewlett Packard, MADAS, Thomas de Colmar, arithmometer, pin wheel, calculator, logarithms, Gunter scale, History of Science, History of Technology, Science and Technology Studies, STS, Engineering, Astronomy, Ptolemy, Horology, anthropology, Ancient Egypt :)
(:keywords history, calculators, rechemaschine, rechenschieber, slide rule, Babylonia, Summeria, Ancient Rome, Ancient Greece, Ancient China, France, Germany, renaissance, Caculatrice, Pascal, Leibnitz, mathematics, arithmetic, Napier, Neper, Briggs, computer, social history, calculator, adding machine, mathematical instruments, Hewlett Packard, MADAS, Thomas de Colmar, arithmometer, pin wheel, calculator, logarithms, Gunter scale, History of Science, History of Technology, Science and Technology Studies, STS, Engineering, Astronomy, Ptolemy, Horology, anthropology, Ancient Egypt, things that count, things-that-count, Jim Falk, University of Melbourne :)
(:keywords history calculators rechemaschine rechenschieber slide rules :)
(:keywords history, calculators, rechemaschine, rechenschieber, slide rule, Babylonia, Summeria, Ancient Rome, Ancient Greece, Ancient China, France, Germany, renaissance, Caculatrice, Pascal, Leibnitz, mathematics, arithmetic, Napier, Neper, Briggs, computer, social history, calculator, adding machine, mathematical instruments, Hewlett Packard, MADAS, Thomas de Colmar, arithmometer, pin wheel, calculator, logarithms, Gunter scale, History of Science, History of Technology, Science and Technology Studies, STS, Engineering, Astronomy, Ptolemy, Horology, anthropology, Ancient Egypt :)
(:keywords history calculators rechemaschine rechenschieber slide rules :)
This page has been visited times.
This page has been visited times since 31 March 2014.
The calculational devices that were developed show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But, as already noted, it is also important to understand why they were invented and used.
The calculational devices that were developed show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But, as already noted, it is also important to understand why they were invented and used.
Even keeping our attention restricted to the basic arithmetic operations, it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science11 through to the sociology of science.12 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” of mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening as and when it did?
Even keeping our attention restricted to the basic arithmetic operations, it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science13 through to the sociology of science.14 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” of mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening as and when it did?
In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom. As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”15 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.16 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom. As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”17 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.18 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
In this discussion, “calculator” is used as shorthand for “calculating technology”. In particular it is taken to mean any physically embodied methodology, however basic, used to assist the performance of arithmetic operations (including counting). Thus a set of stones laid out to show what the result is if two are added to three (to give five), or if in three identical rows of five what the outcome is of multiplying five by three (to give fifteen) will be regarded as a simple calculator. So too, will the fingers of the hand, when used for similar purpose, and even the marking of marks on a medium (such as sand, clay or papyrus) to achieve a similar result.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.19 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which would widely be understood to be a machine. But with that caveat, the term “calculator” will be used here very broadly.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”20 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
In this discussion, “calculator” is used as shorthand for “calculating technology”. In particular it is taken to mean any physically embodied methodology, however basic, used to assist the performance of arithmetic operations (including counting). Thus a set of stones laid out to show what the result is if two are added to three (to give five), or if in three identical rows of five what the outcome is of multiplying five by three (to give fifteen) will be regarded as a simple calculator. So too, will the fingers of the hand, when used for similar purpose, and even the marking of marks on a medium (such as sand, clay or papyrus) to achieve a similar result.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen) is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.21 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which would widely be understood to be a machine. But with that caveat, the term “calculator” will be used here very broadly.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”22 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom. As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”23 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.24 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom. As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”25 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.26 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop but only refers to one object in the collection. Apart from that object (which is some 4,000 years old) the objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop but only one object in the collection is of an appropriate age. Apart from that object (which is some 4,000 years old) the objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what became increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning, the aides were were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later, primitive devices and tables were developed and sold. Over time, much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these devices, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what became increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning, the aides were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later, primitive devices and tables were developed and sold. Over time, much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these devices, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
Early “calculators” were not things, but rather people who were employed to calculate. Over time these people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became very widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Increasingly, since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation appear in virtual form in apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators, seen as devices, in this sense is looming.
Early “calculators” were not things. Rather they were people who were employed to calculate. Over time these people were first aided, but later replaced by calculating devices. These devices became very widely used across many countries. There is evidence we may now be passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. This is because, increasingly since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation have begun to appear in virtual form as apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators, seen as devices, in this sense is looming.
The objects (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)in “collection Calculant”(:ifend:) described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)27. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”28(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)in “collection Calculant”(:ifend:) described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (which are described in more detail in an accompanying web site - “things-that-count.com”)29. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”30(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
As most people know, the spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
As most people know, the spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn, ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Even keeping our attention restricted to the basic arithmetic operations, it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science31 through to the sociology of science.32 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening how and when it did?
Even keeping our attention restricted to the basic arithmetic operations, it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science33 through to the sociology of science.34 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” of mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening as and when it did?
It might be assumed that arithmetic, and more broadly, mathematics, developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, this development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them. For example if you know about addition and that 2+2 =4 then it is possible to ask what number added to 4 gives 2. Answering that involves some idea of a negative number. This progress through ‘completing mathematics’ is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The question of what sort of problems mathematical thinking should be applied to will have different answers in different cultures. In different societies different sorts of issues will be seen as interesting or important (and only some of these will be usefully tackled with mathematics). Also different groups of people will be educated to different degrees (if at all) in what is known in mathematics. Finally, different groups may also have influence in framing the questions mathematicians are encouraged to explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures there have been very different views taken on the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”35 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.36 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
It might be assumed that arithmetic, and more broadly, mathematics, developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, this development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them.
Suppose we know about addition and that 2+2 =4. Then it is possible to ask what number added to 4 would give 2. Answering that involves inventing the idea of a negative number. This leads to progress through ‘completing mathematics’ (i.e. seeking to answer all the questions that arise in mathematics which cannot yet be answered.) That must be part of the story of how mathematics develops. Yet the literature on the history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The question of when mathematics might be useful will have different answers in different cultures. Different societies may identify different sorts of issues as interesting or important (and only some of these will be usefully tackled with mathematics). Also different groups of people in those societies will be educated in what is known in mathematics. Finally, different groups of people, or organisations, may have influence in framing the questions that mathematicians are encouraged (and resourced) to explore.
But the same is true of invention. At different times and in different cultures there have been quite different views taken on the value of change, and thus invention. At some points in history the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). A other times or places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do it. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. This is as true in mathematics as in other areas of human activity.
In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom. As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”37 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.38 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.39 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which would widely be understood to be a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.40 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which would widely be understood to be a machine. But with that caveat, the term “calculator” will be used here very broadly.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop but only refers to one object in the collection. Apart from that object (which is some 4,000 years old) the objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”41) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”42) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity to calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”43) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”44) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans developed the need and capacity calculate, the things they used to help them, and how human societies (and even human brains) evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website both describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”45) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”46) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Fortunately in order to understand what has shaped the development of these calculational aids we can largely avoid talking much about mathematics. This is lucky because mathematics is by now a huge field of knowledge. So in this site we will avoid calculus, set and group theory, the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector spaces that make the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible, and tensors which Einstein used to express his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time.47 It will be sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations which in the end are constituted out of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) and can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
Fortunately in order to understand what has shaped the development of these calculational aids we can largely avoid talking much about mathematics. This is lucky because mathematics is by now a huge field of knowledge. So you are entitled to relief that in this site we will avoid much of mathematics. We need not touch, for example, on calculus, set and group theory, the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector spaces that make the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible, and tensors which Einstein used to express his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time.48 It will be sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations which in the end are constituted out of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) and can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, its development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
It might be assumed that arithmetic, and more broadly, mathematics, developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, this development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them. For example if you know about addition and that 2+2 =4 then it is possible to ask what number added to 4 gives 2. Answering that involves some idea of a negative number. This progress through ‘completing mathematics’ is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what were becoming increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later primitive devices and tables were developed and sold. Over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The need for calculation, however has prospered. As societies have become more complex, transactions in them depending on arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing - and more complex mathematics have intensified. Yet over much of this period, for many people in these societies, doing even the simple arithmetic tasks has been neither easy nor even accessible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals (rather than the development of complex mathematics) which is the primary focus of this website.
Early “calculators” were not things, but rather people who were employed to calculate. Over time these people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became very widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Increasingly since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation appear in virtual form in apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming.
One might imagine that a history of calculators would consist simply of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. Indeed many such accounts do focus on this and the minutae of mechanical invention. But to focus simply on that is to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what became increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning, the aides were were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later, primitive devices and tables were developed and sold. Over time, much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these devices, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The need for calculation, however has prospered. As societies have become more complex, transactions in them depending on arithmetic (the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing), as well as more complex mathematics, have intensified. Yet over much of this period, for many people in these societies, doing even the simplest arithmetic tasks has been neither easy nor, for some, comprehensible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to aid achieving these simple goals (rather than the development of complex mathematics) which is the primary focus of this website.
Early “calculators” were not things, but rather people who were employed to calculate. Over time these people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became very widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Increasingly, since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation appear in virtual form in apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators, seen as devices, in this sense is looming.
One might imagine that a history of calculators would consist simply of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. Indeed many such accounts do focus on this with loving details of the minutae of mechanical invention. But to focus simply on that is to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Across human history many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations. But the development of these begs a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what were becoming increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what were becoming increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later primitive devices and tables were developed and sold. Over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what were becoming increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what were becoming increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, marks scribed on bones and patterns arranged with pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these capabilities became essential ingredients in the skills which enabled them to build increasingly complex societies. The operation of these societies were increasingly dependent on more of their citizens being able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives. As the need for this ability spread a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over time these capabilities became essential ingredients in what were becoming increasingly complex societies. More citizens needed to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives and, over time, a range of aides of various sorts were developed to assist. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these became essential ingredients in the skills which enabled them to build increasingly complex societies. These societies depended on more of their citizens being able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives. As this requirement spread a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these capabilities became essential ingredients in the skills which enabled them to build increasingly complex societies. The operation of these societies were increasingly dependent on more of their citizens being able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives. As the need for this ability spread a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and then develop aides to help them do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these techniques enabled them to build increasingly complex societies. These required more of their citizens to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives. As this requirement spread a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these became essential ingredients in the skills which enabled them to build increasingly complex societies. These societies depended on more of their citizens being able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives. As this requirement spread a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - during which humans came to record their counting and then developed aides to help them do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these techniques enabled them to build societies that increasingly required their citizens to rely on numbers and then manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. As this became more central in living a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning they were implemented in simple ways - for example, as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later through simple devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story, one in which humans came to count, record their counting and then develop aides to help them do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these techniques enabled them to build increasingly complex societies. These required more of their citizens to be able to manipulate numbers in their daily lives. As this requirement spread a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning the aides were were very simple - for example, utilising marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, now represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account in this website outlines (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans came to count, then developed aides to help them do simple sums. Over this time they built societies that increasingly required their citizens to rely on numbers and then manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. To help people do this a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed. At the beginning they were as simple as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles, and later simple devices and tables. But over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things are now little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
Increasingly, as societies have become more complex, transactions in them have depended on mathematics, and in particular on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet over much of this period, for many people in these societies, doing such arithmetic tasks has been neither easy nor even accessible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals, rather than the development of complex mathematics, which is the focus of this website.
The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Now, increasingly since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation appear in virtual form in apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming.
The account given here is of (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - during which humans came to record their counting and then developed aides to help them do simple arithmetic sums. Over this time these techniques enabled them to build societies that increasingly required their citizens to rely on numbers and then manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. As this became more central in living a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed to help. At the beginning they were implemented in simple ways - for example, as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. Later through simple devices and tables were developed and sold, and over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things, where they survive, represent little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The need for calculation, however has prospered. As societies have become more complex, transactions in them depending on arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing - and more complex mathematics have intensified. Yet over much of this period, for many people in these societies, doing even the simple arithmetic tasks has been neither easy nor even accessible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals (rather than the development of complex mathematics) which is the primary focus of this website.
Early “calculators” were not things, but rather people who were employed to calculate. Over time these people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became very widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Increasingly since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation appear in virtual form in apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming.
It will be absolutely familiar to most people that the spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
The calculational devices considered here show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this construction strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
Clearly part of what shapes the invention and design of technologies is the purpose which they are to be used for. For calculating technologies this raises a wider set of questions. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
Fortunately in order to understand what has shaped the development of these calculational aids we can largely avoid talking much about mathematics - that huge field of knowledge that has been developed over millennia. For example, we may avoid calculus, set and group theory, the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector spaces that make the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible, and tensors which Einstein used to express his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time.49 It will be sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - the basic numerical calculations required to finally evaluate practical applications of mathematical formulae. Yet even keeping our attention as restricted as this it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science50 through to the sociology of science.51 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening how and when it did?
As most people know, the spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. As already noted, it is that which is dealt with here.
The calculational devices that were developed show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But, as already noted, it is also important to understand why they were invented and used.
Fortunately in order to understand what has shaped the development of these calculational aids we can largely avoid talking much about mathematics. This is lucky because mathematics is by now a huge field of knowledge. So in this site we will avoid calculus, set and group theory, the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector spaces that make the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible, and tensors which Einstein used to express his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time.52 It will be sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations which in the end are constituted out of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) and can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
Even keeping our attention restricted to the basic arithmetic operations, it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science53 through to the sociology of science.54 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening how and when it did?
The account in this website outlines (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans came to count, then developed aides to help them do simple sums. Over this time they built societies that increasingly required their citizens to rely on numbers and the manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. To help people do this a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed. At the beginning they were as simple as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles, and later simple devices and tables. But over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things are now little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
The account in this website outlines (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans came to count, then developed aides to help them do simple sums. Over this time they built societies that increasingly required their citizens to rely on numbers and then manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. To help people do this a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed. At the beginning they were as simple as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles, and later simple devices and tables. But over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things are now little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
It is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans came to count, then developed aides to help them do simple sums, and the built societies that required their citizens to rely on numbers and the manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. To help people do this they developed a wide range of physical aides. At the beginning they were as simple as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. But later much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these are now essentially mechanical fossils. Now unused their remains can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. The arrival of electronic computing heralded the arrival of a much more subtle way of assisting people in their use of numbers, so much so that much of the time these are by now often almost invisible.
Nevertheless, in much of daily life, despite all the power of modern computers, much of what we transact depends on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet through much of history for many people these sorts of tasks have been neither seen as simple nor even accessible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals, rather than the development of complex mathematics, which is the focus of this website.
The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Now, increasingly, they appear in virtual form as apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming.
The account in this website outlines (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans came to count, then developed aides to help them do simple sums. Over this time they built societies that increasingly required their citizens to rely on numbers and the manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. To help people do this a wide range of aides of various sorts were developed. At the beginning they were as simple as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles, and later simple devices and tables. But over time much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these things are now little more than mechanical fossils. Unused and largely forgotten their remains are scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment.
Increasingly, as societies have become more complex, transactions in them have depended on mathematics, and in particular on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet over much of this period, for many people in these societies, doing such arithmetic tasks has been neither easy nor even accessible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals, rather than the development of complex mathematics, which is the focus of this website.
The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Now, increasingly since the advent of electronic computing, the aides to calculation appear in virtual form in apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming.
It is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans invented ways to count, then help them do simple sums, and to depend on numbers and the manipulation of them in so much of their daily lives. To help them in this task they developed a wide range of physical aides - ranging from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices. The remains of those can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become more subtle, and so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
As with much of daily life, despite all the power of modern computers, much of what we transact depends on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet through much of history these sorts of tasks have been neither seen as simple nor even available to many people. And finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals, rather than the development of complex mathematics, which is the focus of this website.
The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Now, increasingly, they appear in virtual form as apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming, and forms an end point to this account.
One might imagine that this history would consist simply of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. Indeed many such accounts do focus on this and the minutae of mechanical invention. But to focus simply on that is to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
It is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans came to count, then developed aides to help them do simple sums, and the built societies that required their citizens to rely on numbers and the manipulate them simply to succeed in their daily lives. To help people do this they developed a wide range of physical aides. At the beginning they were as simple as marks on bones and patterns of pebbles. But later much more elaborate mechanical devices were developed to help in this task. Many of these are now essentially mechanical fossils. Now unused their remains can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. The arrival of electronic computing heralded the arrival of a much more subtle way of assisting people in their use of numbers, so much so that much of the time these are by now often almost invisible.
Nevertheless, in much of daily life, despite all the power of modern computers, much of what we transact depends on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet through much of history for many people these sorts of tasks have been neither seen as simple nor even accessible. For this reason finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals, rather than the development of complex mathematics, which is the focus of this website.
The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Now, increasingly, they appear in virtual form as apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming.
One might imagine that a history of calculators would consist simply of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. Indeed many such accounts do focus on this and the minutae of mechanical invention. But to focus simply on that is to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
As with much of daily life, despite all the power of modern computers, much of what is transacted depends on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet through much of history none of these have been either seen as simple or even available to many people. And finding ways to do these faster and more accurately has been a preoccupation during millennia. This, rather than the development of complex mathematics, is the focus of this account.
The history developed here stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, and forward to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
Such a history could be simply an account of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
It is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - of how humans invented ways to count, then help them do simple sums, and to depend on numbers and the manipulation of them in so much of their daily lives. To help them in this task they developed a wide range of physical aides - ranging from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices. The remains of those can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become more subtle, and so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
As with much of daily life, despite all the power of modern computers, much of what we transact depends on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet through much of history these sorts of tasks have been neither seen as simple nor even available to many people. And finding ways to do these tasks faster and more accurately, and to spread the ability across more people, has been a preoccupation in many societies. It is the approaches that have been taken to these simple goals, rather than the development of complex mathematics, which is the focus of this website.
The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. Now, increasingly, they appear in virtual form as apps in phones, tablets and laptops. The end of calculators in this sense is looming, and forms an end point to this account.
One might imagine that this history would consist simply of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. Indeed many such accounts do focus on this and the minutae of mechanical invention. But to focus simply on that is to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
This history stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, and forward to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
As with much of daily life, despite all the power of modern computers, much of what is transacted depends on simple arithmetic - the familiar tasks of counting, adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. Yet through much of history none of these have been either seen as simple or even available to many people. And finding ways to do these faster and more accurately has been a preoccupation during millennia. This, rather than the development of complex mathematics, is the focus of this account.
The history developed here stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, and forward to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year account - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 37,000 year account - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg
(Replica Pascaline “1652” - collection Calculant)
(:ifend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website uses a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”55) to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website both describes a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”56) and uses it to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website () utilises a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”57) to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website uses a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”58) to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) utilises a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”59) to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to things-that-count.com. This website () utilises a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”60) to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
This history stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, and forward to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. They were replaced by calculating devices. We are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
This history stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, and forward to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. Over time those people were first aided, and then replaced by calculating devices. These devices became incredibly widely used across many countries. But we are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)61. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”62(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)in “collection Calculant”(:ifend:) described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)63. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”64(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)65. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”66(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)67. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”68(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)69. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)70(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)71. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”72(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)73. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)74(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant” (the name also of an accompanying web site)75. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)76(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which is used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)77. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)78(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which are used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)79. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)80(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The “Collection Calculant” described here, which is used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)81. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)82(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The objects in “collection Calculant” described here, which is used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions, are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)83. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)84(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The “Collection Calculant” described here, which is used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)85. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)86(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is that of a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The “Collection Calculant” described here, which is used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)87. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)88(:ifend:). The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The “Collection Calculant” which will be used as guides to answering some of these questions are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)89. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)90(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is that of a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The “Collection Calculant” described here, which is used to help illustrate answers to these sort of questions are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)91. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)92(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is that of a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things humans have devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) utilises a collection of antique calculators -“collection Calculant”93 - to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) utilises a collection of antique calculators (“collection Calculant”94) to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things for counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This history of calculation stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. They were replaced by calculating devices. We are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
One might suppose that a history of such devices might be simply served by an account of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
Supporting this account is “Collection Calculant” - a collection of ‘things’ which were constructed at one time or another, over some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)95. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)96(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is that of a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things humans have devised to assist counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This history stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, and forward to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. They were replaced by calculating devices. We are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
Such a history could be simply an account of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
The “Collection Calculant” which will be used as guides to answering some of these questions are drawn from across some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)97. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)98(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is that of a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) utilises a collection of antique calculators -“collection Calculant”99 to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) utilises a collection of antique calculators -“collection Calculant”100 - to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) both describes a collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant”101 and also uses that collection to help build an account of the interesting history of the way humans, over millennia, have not only developed devices to assist a developing social need to count and calculate, but indeed how human society (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) utilises a collection of antique calculators -“collection Calculant”102 to help develop a historical account of the way humans, over millennia, have developed the need and capacity to count and calculate, and how human societies (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) both describes an intriguing collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant”103 from can be drawn an account of the interesting history of the way humans, over millennia, have not only developed devices to assist a developing social need to count and calculate, but indeed how human society (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) both describes a collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant”104 and also uses that collection to help build an account of the interesting history of the way humans, over millennia, have not only developed devices to assist a developing social need to count and calculate, but indeed how human society (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe an intriguing collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant”105 from can be drawn an account of the interesting history of the way humans, over millennia, have not only developed devices to assist a developing social need to count and calculate, but indeed how human society (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
This is (:fiend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things for counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This website (things-that-count.com) both describes an intriguing collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant”106 from can be drawn an account of the interesting history of the way humans, over millennia, have not only developed devices to assist a developing social need to count and calculate, but indeed how human society (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
This is (:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things for counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather intriguing collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant” which are used to build an evocative picture of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate.
Whilst you are currently reading “Things that Count” on this website it will soon also be able to be down-loaded as a short book. It’s topic is the fascinating ways in which ways of using things to add things up and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.107 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:fiend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these things can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. Now, of course, with electronic computers, the aides they provide to doing everyday calculations have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This history of calculation stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story. So also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
One might suppose that for the purposes of such a history a story of progressive discovery and invention would suffice. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. The appearance of what were often weird things devised for doing simple calculations across human history begs a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe an intriguing collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant”108 from can be drawn an account of the interesting history of the way humans, over millennia, have not only developed devices to assist a developing social need to count and calculate, but indeed how human society (and even human brains) have evolved with those developments.
This is (:fiend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines(:ifend:) a 10,000 year story - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of things for counting - from marks on bones to elaborate mechanical devices - can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. With the arrival of electronic computing, such aides have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This history of calculation stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of tools to help manipulate numbers, to the subsequent progressive disappearance of calculating devices into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. They were replaced by calculating devices. We are now passing the heyday of such stand-alone calculators. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this account.
One might suppose that a history of such devices might be simply served by an account of the progressive discovery and invention of ever more effective and sophisticated calculating devices. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. Many weird things were indeed devised for doing simple calculations across human history. But they beg a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather intriguing collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are currently reading this essay on the website. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded as a short book. It’s topic is the fascinating ways in which ways of using things to add things up and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.109 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather intriguing collection of antique objects - “collection Calculant” which are used to build an evocative picture of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate.
Whilst you are currently reading “Things that Count” on this website it will soon also be able to be down-loaded as a short book. It’s topic is the fascinating ways in which ways of using things to add things up and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.110 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:fiend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across things which humans invented to help them do simple sums as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these things can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. Now, of course, with electronic computers, the aides they provide to doing everyday calculations have become so much part of our lives that they are often almost invisible.
This perspective on the long history of calculation thus stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but so also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
One might suppose that this would amount to little more than a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. Across human history can be found an often weird variety of things for calculating. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
This history of calculation stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story. So also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
One might suppose that for the purposes of such a history a story of progressive discovery and invention would suffice. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially interesting. The appearance of what were often weird things devised for doing simple calculations across human history begs a series of questions: When and why were they made, how were they used, and why at times were they forgotten for centuries or even millennia?
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather intriguing collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather intriguing collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather intriguing collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg
(Replica Pascaline - collection Calculant)
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg (Replica Pascaline - collection Calculant
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg
(Replica Pascaline - collection Calculant)
http://meta-studies.net/pmwiki/uploads/PA_1.jpg (Replica Pascaline - collection Calculant
Supporting this account is “Collection Calculant” - a collection of ‘things’ which were constructed at one time or another, over some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)111. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)112(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Supporting this account is “Collection Calculant” - a collection of ‘things’ which were constructed at one time or another, over some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)113. The name of the collection is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)114(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is that of a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (http://things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
The associated collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are currently reading this essay on the website. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded as a short book. It’s topic is the fascinating ways in which ways of using things to add things up and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The associated collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The associated collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The associated collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”. 115 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.116 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
- The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.**117 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”. 118 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.119 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
- The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.**120 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
Supporting this account is “Collection Calculant” - a collection of ‘things’ which were constructed at one time or another, over some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)121. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)122(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Supporting this account is “Collection Calculant” - a collection of ‘things’ which were constructed at one time or another, over some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)123. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)124(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
- The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.**125 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.126 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.127 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
- The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.**128 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (http://things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing quite a wide-ranging essay on this.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (http://things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing a quite wide-ranging essay on this.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst this essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading it now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading the essay now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the essay is titled “Things that Count”. You can read it here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the essay is titled “Things that Count”. You are reading it now here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”. The essay is titled “Things that Count”. You can read it here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the essay is titled “Things that Count”. You can read it here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (http://things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing quite a wide-ranging essay on this.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (http://things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing quite a wide-ranging essay on this.
Supporting this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over some 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)129. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)130(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Supporting this account is “Collection Calculant” - a collection of ‘things’ which were constructed at one time or another, over some 4,000 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)131. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)132(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”. The Essay is titled “Things that Count”. It is being prepared as a short book - on the interesting way in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together. In due course you will be able to download this book from this website.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”. The essay is titled “Things that Count”. You can read it here. But it will soon also be able to be down-loaded from here as a short book. It is about the fascinating ways in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website. Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing quite a wide-ranging essay on this.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website (http://things-that-count.com). Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing quite a wide-ranging essay on this.
The collection name - calculate is from the Latin for “they calculate”.133 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - “calculant” is from the Latin for “they calculate”.134 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website. Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which were acquired to illustrate the history of calculation. The collection is used to provide the ‘framework’ for a quite wide-ranging essay on the same subject.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the Essay and website are called “Things that Count”. The essay is also being prepared so it can be downloaded as a short book - on the interesting way in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection name - calculant - in Latin means “they calculate”.135 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website. Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which have been brought together over a number of years. They provide an evocative picture of their role in the evolution of how humans have come to use things to help them calculate. That is used as an excuse for writing quite a wide-ranging essay on this.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”. The Essay is titled “Things that Count”. It is being prepared as a short book - on the interesting way in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together. In due course you will be able to download this book from this website.
The collection name - calculate is from the Latin for “they calculate”.136 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is a website containing the description of a collection of antique objects to do with the history of calculation, and an essay on the same subject.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is first a website. Its purpose is to describe a rather extraordinary collection of antique objects which were acquired to illustrate the history of calculation. The collection is used to provide the ‘framework’ for a quite wide-ranging essay on the same subject.
The collection name - calculant - in Latin means “they calculate”.137 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - calculant - in Latin means “they calculate”.138 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - ranging across ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - calculant - in Latin means “they calculate”).139 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection name - calculant - in Latin means “they calculate”.140 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the Essay and website are called “Things that Count”. The essay is also being prepared so it can be downloaded as a short book - on the way calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the Essay and website are called “Things that Count”. The essay is also being prepared so it can be downloaded as a short book - on the interesting way in which calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the Essay and website are called “Things that Count”. “Things that Count” is also being prepared so it can be downloaded as a short book - an essay on the way calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the Essay and website are called “Things that Count”. The essay is also being prepared so it can be downloaded as a short book - on the way calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to both “Things that Count”, the title of this explanation for what can be found in “Calculant”. (Calculant is thus both the name of this web site and also a collection of antique related objects. In Latin it means “they calculate”).141 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Things that Count”. This is a website containing the description of a collection of antique objects to do with the history of calculation, and an essay on the same subject.
The collection is called “Collection Calculant”, whilst the Essay and website are called “Things that Count”. “Things that Count” is also being prepared so it can be downloaded as a short book - an essay on the way calculation technology and human society (and even the human brain) have evolved together.
The collection name - calculant - in Latin means “they calculate”).142 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
In brief this is one perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but so also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
This perspective on the long history of calculation thus stretches from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but so also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to both “Things that Count”, the title of this explanation for what can be found in “Calculant” (the name of this web site and a corresponding collection of antique objects. In Latin it means “they calculate”).143 The explanation is a little extended as it spans some 10,000 years of human history(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
In brief the account here presents a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but so also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to both “Things that Count”, the title of this explanation for what can be found in “Calculant”. (Calculant is thus both the name of this web site and also a collection of antique related objects. In Latin it means “they calculate”).144 The history of human calculation using “things that count” spans some 10,000 years, and so this explanation is a bit extended(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
In brief this is one perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but so also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to both “Things that Count”, the title of this account, and “Calculant” (the name of this web site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).145 This includes a 10,000 year story(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to both “Things that Count”, the title of this explanation for what can be found in “Calculant” (the name of this web site and a corresponding collection of antique objects. In Latin it means “they calculate”).146 The explanation is a little extended as it spans some 10,000 years of human history(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).147 This includes a 10,000 year story(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to both “Things that Count”, the title of this account, and “Calculant” (the name of this web site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).148 This includes a 10,000 year story(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
(:title Stepping stones: toward the end of calculators :)
(:title Things that Count :)
In brief the account here presents a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but sp also is the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
In brief the account here presents a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but so also are the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).149 This includes a 10,000 year story(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
In brief the account here presents a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
One might suppose that this would amount to little more than a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. These stepping stones are scattered across human history. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).150 This includes a 10,000 year story(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. Examples of these can be found scattered across history from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
In brief the account here presents a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The first calculators were people who calculated. That role has essentially vanished. But we are also passing the heyday of the stand-alone device known as a calculator. The end of calculators in this sense is part of this story, but sp also is the ends that calculators have at different times been created to meet.
One might suppose that this would amount to little more than a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. Across human history can be found an often weird variety of things for calculating. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
The spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
It will be absolutely familiar to most people that the spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
The “stepping stones” considered here as laying out the path of this development show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this construction strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The calculational devices considered here show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this construction strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.151 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.152 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which would widely be understood to be a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
Supporting this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)153. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)154(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Supporting this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over some 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)155. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)156(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
In short the account here is devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
In brief the account here presents a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)157. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)158(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Supporting this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)159. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)160(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)161. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)162(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)163. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)164(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. In earlier times it could simply mean someone who calculates. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
One might suppose that this would really amount to just a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. These stepping stones are scattered across human history. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
One might suppose that this would amount to little more than a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. These stepping stones are scattered across human history. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
One might think this is really just a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. These stepping stones are scattered across human history. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
One might suppose that this would really amount to just a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. These stepping stones are scattered across human history. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site165. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)166(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site)167. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)168(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was supposed to aid the acts of thinking about numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site169. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)170(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was created with a belief that it could assist people in thinking about (and with) numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site171. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)172(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":) Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).173 This includes a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible. (:ifend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) This short book outlines a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible. (:ifend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).174 This includes a 10,000 year story(:ifend:)(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This short book outlines a 10,000 year story(:ifend:) - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
This short book outlines a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
This short book outlines a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to depend (or ‘count’) on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).175 This includes a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from the earliest moments of human pre-history stretch to our present. We are living a moment where electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of their work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).176 This includes a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
This short book outlines a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from the earliest moments of human pre-history stretch to our present. We are living a moment where electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of their work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
This short book outlines a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from earliest human pre-history to our present moment. We are living in a time when electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of how they work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800) when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
A word also about the way I have constructed the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself177), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition178 (but there is not much need to focus on that here)
A word also about the way I have constructed the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself179), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition180 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
This book tells a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from the earliest moments of human pre-history stretch to our present. We are living a moment where electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of their work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
This short book outlines a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from the earliest moments of human pre-history stretch to our present. We are living a moment where electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of their work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this construction strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The “stepping stones” considered here as laying out the path of this development show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this construction strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).181 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones which stretch back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). This is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":) Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).182 This includes a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from the earliest moments of human pre-history stretch to our present. We are living a moment where electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of their work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible. (:ifend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) This book tells a 10,000 year story - an account of the ideas and things which humans invented as they came to count and then to ‘count’ on counting in so much of their daily lives. These “stepping stones” stretch forward from the earliest moments of human pre-history stretch to our present. We are living a moment where electronic computers, and the counting which forms a central part of their work, are becoming so much part of our lives that they are almost invisible. (:ifend:)
In short the account here is devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
One might think this is really just a story of progressive discovery and invention. But that would be to oversimplify and lose much of what is potentially really interesting. These stepping stones are scattered across human history. When and why they were made, how they were used, and why at times they were forgotten for centuries or even millennia is also a poignant part of the picture. So several stories are tangled together here, each informing the other.
Underlying this account is something else - a collection of ‘things’ constructed at one time or another, over more than 500 years of history. Each of them was supposed to aid the acts of thinking about numbers. They range from little metal coin-like disks to the earliest electronic pocket calculators - representing a sort of ‘vanishing point’ for all that had come before. For convenience, I will refer to this set of artifacts as “collection Calculant”(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) (the name also of an accompanying web site183. The name is taken from the Latin meaning simply “they calculate”)184(:ifend:). So part of the story here also is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
A word also about the way I have constructed the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition185 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
A word also about the way I have constructed the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself186), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition187 (but there is not much need to focus on that here)
A word also about the way I have approached constructing the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition188 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
A word also about the way I have constructed the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition189 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Similarly the historical account breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
Thus the historical account is broken into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)A word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Second, a word about the different parts of the essay. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition190 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":) This is a work in progress, which in part is why it is formed as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This book should be regarded as a work in progress. Corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.(:ifend:)
A word also about the way the book is structured. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition191 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":) This book should be regarded as a work in progress. Corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Similarly the main body of the book breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
A word also about the way I have approached constructing the historical account. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition192 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Similarly the historical account breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
A final word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)A word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
(:ifend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "True":)This book should be regarded as a work in progress. Corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.(:ifend:)
A word also about the way the book is structured. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition193 (but there is not much need to focus on that here). (:ifend:)
Similarly the main body of the book breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:ShowTrails} "True":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:ShowTrails} "True":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:ShowTrails} "True":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:PSW} "False":)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:ShowTrails} "True":)
(:ifend:)
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:ShowTrails} "True":)
(:ifend:)
« | | Part 1 Origins »
(:if equal {Site.PrintBook$:ShowTrails} "True":) « | | Part 1 Origins » (:ifend:)
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
« | | Part 1 Origins »
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
« | | Part 1 Origins »
« | HistoryTrail | Part 1 Origins »
« | | Part 1 Origins »
« | | Part 1 Origins »
« | HistoryTrail | Part 1 Origins »
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
« | | Part 1 Origins »
«|[[HistoryTrail|History Contents]|»
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
«|[[HistoryTrail|H]|»
«|[[HistoryTrail|History Contents]|»
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
«|[[HistoryTrail|]|»
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the issue of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, its development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, its development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - the basic numerical calculations required to finally evaluate practical applications of mathematical formulae. Yet even keeping our attention as restricted as this it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science194 through to the sociology of science.195 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - the basic numerical calculations required to finally evaluate practical applications of mathematical formulae. Yet even keeping our attention as restricted as this it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science196 through to the sociology of science.197 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights. In particular, whether concerning ourselves with the evolution of the simple areas of mathematics or the more obstruse areas, one question is always raised: what led to this particular development happening how and when it did?
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary developments in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein to write his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time in this universe.198 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - the basic numerical calculations required in practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet even keeping our attention as restricted as this it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science199 through to the sociology of science.200 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights.
Fortunately in order to understand what has shaped the development of these calculational aids we can largely avoid talking much about mathematics - that huge field of knowledge that has been developed over millennia. For example, we may avoid calculus, set and group theory, the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector spaces that make the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible, and tensors which Einstein used to express his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time.201 It will be sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - the basic numerical calculations required to finally evaluate practical applications of mathematical formulae. Yet even keeping our attention as restricted as this it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science202 through to the sociology of science.203 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this construction strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
Clearly part of what shapes the invention and design of technologies is the purpose which they are to be used for. For calculating technologies this raises a wider set of questions. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example, important though they are we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.204 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems, in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science205 through to the sociology of science.206 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary developments in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein to write his wonderfully neat equations for the shape of space-time in this universe.207 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of additions and subtractions (and multiplications and divisions) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - the basic numerical calculations required in practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet even keeping our attention as restricted as this it turns out we will still encounter some of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. Of course history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of history and philosophy of science208 through to the sociology of science.209 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will still be useful to take some account of this literature and its insights.
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on the culture of the society in which that thinking is developing and what is seen as interesting or important. Beyond that there has historically been a shifting story about who may be taught mathematical thinking and who should frame the questions mathematicians explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the issue of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. For example, its development might have been propelled forward because people could ask questions which arise within mathematics, but require the invention of new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The question of what sort of problems mathematical thinking should be applied to will have different answers in different cultures. In different societies different sorts of issues will be seen as interesting or important (and only some of these will be usefully tackled with mathematics). Also different groups of people will be educated to different degrees (if at all) in what is known in mathematics. Finally, different groups may also have influence in framing the questions mathematicians are encouraged to explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures there have been very different views taken on the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).210 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).211 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).212 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).213 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example, important though they are we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.214 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems, in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science215 through to the sociology of science.216 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
Did increases in the power of mathematics lead the development of calculators? Was it the other way round?
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on the culture of the society in which that thinking is developing and what is seen as interesting or important. Beyond that there has historically been a shifting story about who may be taught mathematical thinking and who should frame the questions mathematicians explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”217 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.218 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
One of the key features of the contemporary world is its high level of interconnection. In such a world it is easy to imagine that developments in “mathematics” which happen in one place will be known and built on almost simultaneously in another. Yet that is a very modern concept. In most of history the movement of information across space and time has been slow and very imperfect. So what at what one time has been discovered in one place may well have been forgotten a generation or two later, and unheard of in many other places. For this reason, amongst others already mentioned, talk of the evolution of mathematics as if it had a definite timetable, and a single direction is likely to be very misleading.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations have occurred when evidence of them can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
What is a calculator?
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
In this discussion, “calculator” is used as shorthand for “calculating technology”. In particular it is taken to mean any physically embodied methodology, however basic, used to assist the performance of arithmetic operations (including counting). Thus a set of stones laid out to show what the result is if two are added to three (to give five), or if in three identical rows of five what the outcome is of multiplying five by three (to give fifteen) will be regarded as a simple calculator. So too, will the fingers of the hand, when used for similar purpose, and even the marking of marks on a medium (such as sand, clay or papyrus) to achieve a similar result.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.219 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”220 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
A discussion in three parts.
A final word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Second, a word about the different parts of the essay. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition221 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
1 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
2 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
3 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
4 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
5 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
6 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
7 The full address is http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
8 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
9 The full address is http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
10 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
11 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
12 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
13 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
14 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
15 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
16 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
17 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
18 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
19 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
20 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
21 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
22 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
23 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
24 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
25 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
26 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
27 see http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
28 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
29 The full address is http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
30 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
31 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
32 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
33 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
34 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
35 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
36 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
37 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
38 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
39 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
40 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
41 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
42 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
43 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
44 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
45 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
46 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
47 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
48 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
49 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
50 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
51 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
52 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
53 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
54 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
55 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
56 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
57 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
58 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
59 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
60 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
61 see http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
62 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
63 see http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
64 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
65 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
66 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
67 see http://things-that-count.com. The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
68 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
69 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
70 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
71 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
72 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
73 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
74 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
75 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
76 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
77 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
78 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
79 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
80 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
81 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
82 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
83 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
84 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
85 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
86 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
87 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
88 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
89 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
90 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
91 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
92 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
93 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
94 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
95 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
96 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
97 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
98 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
99 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
100 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
101 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
102 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
103 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
104 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
105 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
106 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
107 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
108 “Calculant” in Latin means literally “they calculate”. (More precisely it is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”). (↑)
109 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
110 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
111 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
112 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
113 things-that-count.com The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
114 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
115 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
116 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
117 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
118 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
119 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
120 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
121 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
122 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
123 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
124 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
125 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
126 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
127 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
128 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
129 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
130 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
131 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
132 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
133 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
134 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
135 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
136 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
137 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
138 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
139 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
140 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
141 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
142 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
143 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
144 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
145 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
146 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
147 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
148 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
149 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
150 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
151 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
152 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
153 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
154 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
155 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
156 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
157 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
158 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
159 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
160 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
161 http://calculant.meta-studies.net (↑)
162 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
163 http://calculant.meta-studies.net The author, Jim Falk, may be contacted through this website. (↑)
164 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
165 http://calculant.meta-studies.net (↑)
166 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
167 http://calculant.meta-studies.net (↑)
168 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
169 http://calculant.meta-studies.net (↑)
170 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
171 http://calculant.meta-studies.net (↑)
172 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
173 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
174 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
175 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
176 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
177 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009 (↑)
178 ibid, pp. 132–45. (↑)
179 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009 (↑)
180 ibid, pp. 132–45. (↑)
181 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
182 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
183 http://calculant.meta-studies.net (↑)
184 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
185 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
186 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009 (↑)
187 ibid, pp. 132–45. (↑)
188 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
189 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
190 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
191 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
192 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
193 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
194 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
195 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
196 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
197 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
198 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
199 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
200 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
201 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
202 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
203 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
204 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
205 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
206 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
207 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
208 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
209 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
210 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
211 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
212 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
213 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
214 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
215 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
216 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
217 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
218 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
219 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
220 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
221 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).1 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).2 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example, important though they are we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.3 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems, in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science4 through to the sociology of science.5 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
Did increases in the power of mathematics lead the development of calculators? Was it the other way round?
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on the culture of the society in which that thinking is developing and what is seen as interesting or important. Beyond that there has historically been a shifting story about who may be taught mathematical thinking and who should frame the questions mathematicians explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”6 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.7 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
One of the key features of the contemporary world is its high level of interconnection. In such a world it is easy to imagine that developments in “mathematics” which happen in one place will be known and built on almost simultaneously in another. Yet that is a very modern concept. In most of history the movement of information across space and time has been slow and very imperfect. So what at what one time has been discovered in one place may well have been forgotten a generation or two later, and unheard of in many other places. For this reason, amongst others already mentioned, talk of the evolution of mathematics as if it had a definite timetable, and a single direction is likely to be very misleading.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations have occurred when evidence of them can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
What is a calculator?
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
In this discussion, “calculator” is used as shorthand for “calculating technology”. In particular it is taken to mean any physically embodied methodology, however basic, used to assist the performance of arithmetic operations (including counting). Thus a set of stones laid out to show what the result is if two are added to three (to give five), or if in three identical rows of five what the outcome is of multiplying five by three (to give fifteen) will be regarded as a simple calculator. So too, will the fingers of the hand, when used for similar purpose, and even the marking of marks on a medium (such as sand, clay or papyrus) to achieve a similar result.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.8 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”9 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
A discussion in three parts.
A final word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Second, a word about the different parts of the essay. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition10 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
1 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
2 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
3 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
4 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
5 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
6 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
7 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
8 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
9 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
10 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).1 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones which stretch back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). This is a collection of
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).2 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones which stretch back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). This is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Initial observations.
The spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example, important though they are we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.3 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems, in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science4 through to the sociology of science.5 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
Did increases in the power of mathematics lead the development of calculators? Was it the other way round?
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on the culture of the society in which that thinking is developing and what is seen as interesting or important. Beyond that there has historically been a shifting story about who may be taught mathematical thinking and who should frame the questions mathematicians explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”6 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.7 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
One of the key features of the contemporary world is its high level of interconnection. In such a world it is easy to imagine that developments in “mathematics” which happen in one place will be known and built on almost simultaneously in another. Yet that is a very modern concept. In most of history the movement of information across space and time has been slow and very imperfect. So what at what one time has been discovered in one place may well have been forgotten a generation or two later, and unheard of in many other places. For this reason, amongst others already mentioned, talk of the evolution of mathematics as if it had a definite timetable, and a single direction is likely to be very misleading.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations have occurred when evidence of them can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
What is a calculator?
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
In this discussion, “calculator” is used as shorthand for “calculating technology”. In particular it is taken to mean any physically embodied methodology, however basic, used to assist the performance of arithmetic operations (including counting). Thus a set of stones laid out to show what the result is if two are added to three (to give five), or if in three identical rows of five what the outcome is of multiplying five by three (to give fifteen) will be regarded as a simple calculator. So too, will the fingers of the hand, when used for similar purpose, and even the marking of marks on a medium (such as sand, clay or papyrus) to achieve a similar result.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.8 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”9 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
A discussion in three parts.
A final word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Second, a word about the different parts of the essay. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition10 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
1 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
2 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
3 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
4 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
5 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
6 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
7 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
8 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
9 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
10 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).1 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones which stretch back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). This is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Initial observations.
The spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example, important though they are we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.2 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems, in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science3 through to the sociology of science.4 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
Did increases in the power of mathematics lead the development of calculators? Was it the other way round?
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on the culture of the society in which that thinking is developing and what is seen as interesting or important. Beyond that there has historically been a shifting story about who may be taught mathematical thinking and who should frame the questions mathematicians explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
As an illustration it is worth remembering that astrology has until relatively recently been considered both a legitimate area of human knowledge and a key impetus for mathematical development. Thus E. G. Taylor writes of the understandings in England in the late sixteenth century: “The dictum that mathematics was evil for long cut at the very roots of the mathematical arts and practices. How were those to be answered for whom mathematics meant astronomy, astronomy meant astrology, astrology meant demonology, and demonology was demonstrably evil?”5 Indeed, it was noted that when the first mathematical Chairs were established at Oxford University, parents kept their sons from attending let they be ‘smutted with the Black Art’.6 However, despite these negative connotations, practioners of “the dark arts” played a strong role in developing and refining instruments and methodologies for recording and predicting the movement of “star signs” as they moved across the celestial sphere.
One of the key features of the contemporary world is its high level of interconnection. In such a world it is easy to imagine that developments in “mathematics” which happen in one place will be known and built on almost simultaneously in another. Yet that is a very modern concept. In most of history the movement of information across space and time has been slow and very imperfect. So what at what one time has been discovered in one place may well have been forgotten a generation or two later, and unheard of in many other places. For this reason, amongst others already mentioned, talk of the evolution of mathematics as if it had a definite timetable, and a single direction is likely to be very misleading.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations have occurred when evidence of them can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
What is a calculator?
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
In this discussion, “calculator” is used as shorthand for “calculating technology”. In particular it is taken to mean any physically embodied methodology, however basic, used to assist the performance of arithmetic operations (including counting). Thus a set of stones laid out to show what the result is if two are added to three (to give five), or if in three identical rows of five what the outcome is of multiplying five by three (to give fifteen) will be regarded as a simple calculator. So too, will the fingers of the hand, when used for similar purpose, and even the marking of marks on a medium (such as sand, clay or papyrus) to achieve a similar result.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.7 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”8 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
A discussion in three parts.
A final word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Second, a word about the different parts of the essay. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition9 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
1 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
2 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
3 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
4 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
5 E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor & Stuart England 1485–1714, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation, 1970, p. 4. (↑)
6 John Aubrey quoted in Taylor, ibid, p. 8. (↑)
7 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
8 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
9 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).1 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (potentially final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones which stretch back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). This is a collection of
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).2 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).3 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site, and in Latin meaning “they calculate”).4 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site - in Latin meaning “they calculate”).5 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (which in case you wonder, is Latin for “they calculate”).6 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (the name of this site, and in Latin meaning “they calculate”).7 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (which in case you wonder, is Latin for “they calculate).8 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (which in case you wonder, is Latin for “they calculate”).9 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant”.10 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant” (which in case you wonder, is Latin for “they calculate).11 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.12 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with a more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.13 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations occurred evidence of it can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations have occurred when evidence of them can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science14 through to the sociology of science.15 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems, in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science16 through to the sociology of science.17 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning, which in various ways they have been made to assist.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning which in various ways they have been made to assist.
The invention and design of technologies has shaped in major part on what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning, which in various ways they have been made to assist.
The invention and design of technologies has been shaped in major part by what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning, which in various ways they have been made to assist.
The spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies, had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
The spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction - from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics? It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on social considerations. Beyond that there is a shifting story about who might legitimately be taught what is known about mathematics and who should address themselves to such questions.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and place much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. But even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics. It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The idea of ‘mathematics’, and doing it, are themselves inventions. The decision about the sort of problems mathematical thinking might be applied to depends also on the culture of the society in which that thinking is developing and what is seen as interesting or important. Beyond that there has historically been a shifting story about who may be taught mathematical thinking and who should frame the questions mathematicians explore.
Similarly at different times and in different cultures have been very differing ideas about the value of invention. At some moments the mainstream view has been that the crucial task is to preserve the known truth (for example, as discovered by some earlier civilisation - notably the ancient Greeks, or as stated in a holy book). But at other times and places much greater value has been placed on inventing new knowledge. Even when invention is in good standing there can be a big question of who is to be permitted to do that. And even if invention is applauded it may be still true that this may only be in certain areas considered appropriate or important. In short, a lot of factors can shape what is seen as “mathematics”, what it is to be used for, and by whom.
One of the key features of the contemporary world is its high level of interconnection. In such a world it is easy to imagine that developments in “mathematics” which happen in one place will be known and built on almost simultaneously in another. Yet that is a very modern concept. In most of history the movement of information across space and time has been slow and very imperfect. So what at what one time has been discovered in one place may well have been forgotten a generation or two later, and unheard of in many other places. So, talk of the evolution of mathematics as if it had a definite timetable, and a single direction is likely to be very misleading.
We can only know where development occurred from where there is any evidence remaining. Even this reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. No doubt this is but a shadow of the totality constituting a complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery all according to the particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is will be seen to be illuminated by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. And at times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and times, vice-versa.
One of the key features of the contemporary world is its high level of interconnection. In such a world it is easy to imagine that developments in “mathematics” which happen in one place will be known and built on almost simultaneously in another. Yet that is a very modern concept. In most of history the movement of information across space and time has been slow and very imperfect. So what at what one time has been discovered in one place may well have been forgotten a generation or two later, and unheard of in many other places. For this reason, amongst others already mentioned, talk of the evolution of mathematics as if it had a definite timetable, and a single direction is likely to be very misleading.
History of course relies on evidence. We can only know where and when innovations occurred evidence of it can be uncovered. Even the partial picture thus uncovered reveals a patchwork of developments in different directions. That is certainly a shadow of the whole complex pattern of discovery, invention, forgetting, and re-discovery which will have been shaped at different times by particular needs and constraints of different cultures, values, political structures, religions, and practices. In short, understanding the evolution of calculating machines is assisted by investigating it in the context of the evolution of mathematical thinking. But that is no simple picture. The history of developments in calculators and mathematics has been embroidered and shaped by the the social, political and economic circumstances in which they emerged. At times, mathematical developments have shaped developments in calculators, and and other times, the opposite has been true.
The above raises the question of what is to be meant by a “calculator”. “Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. For some, it may conjure up an ‘app.’ on an iphone for doing a range of calculations. For others it may evoke the small digital calculating devices (such as the Hewlett Packard HP-35) which became pervasive in the last three decades of the twentieth century. For others it may include the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
“Calculator” could be taken to mean a variety of things. It could be calculation ‘app.’ on a smart phone, a stand alone elctronic calculator from the 1970s, or the motorised and before that hand-cranked mechanical devices that preceded the electronic machines. It is difficult to see where the line should be drawn in this regress all the way back to the abstract manipulation of ‘numbers’.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.18 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”), rather than “calculating machines”.
This approach is certainly not that taken in all the literature. Ernest Martin in his widely cited book “The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen)” is at pains to argue of the abacus (as well as slide rules, and similar devices), that “it is erroneous to term this instrument a machine because it lacks the characteristics of a machine”.19 In deference to this what is referred to here is “calculators” (and sometimes “calculating technologies or “calculating devices”). Where the phrase “calculating machine” is used it will be in the sense used by Martin, referring to something with a more than just a basic mechanism which we would comfortably refer to as a machine. But with that caveat, we will be using the term “calculator” very broadly.
In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition20 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
A final word on the state and structure of this essay. First it is a work in progress. That is why I have chosen to publish it as a website. So please regard it as a first draft (for which there may never be a final version). For this reason, corrections, additional insights, or links to other resources I should know about will be much appreciated.
Second, a word about the different parts of the essay. In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition21 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Welcome to “Calculant”.22 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). It is thus a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In this way the collection and the history it illustrates form a duet - where the two voices each tell part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant”.23 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the beginnings of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones which stretch back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). This is a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. The collection and the history it illustrates in a sense form a duet - the two voices each telling part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The early personal calculators of the 1980s presaged the birth of the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies, had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. For this reason, whilst mathematics encompasses much more than arithmetic it is not necessary to consider all the historical development of its more elaborate analytic structures in order to gain much from looking at how the technologies of mathematics developed.
The stepping stones along the path of the development of human aids to calculation show an obvious progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies depends in major part on what they were to be used for. There are a number of aspects to this and a range of them will be dealt with in this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning, which in various ways they have been made to assist. In deference to later considerations we might add a qualifier - which they have been made to assist “perhaps”!
The spread of electronic personal calculators of the 1970s was followed quickly by the first personal computers. Before long, computer chips began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices. In turn ever greater computing power spread across the planet. However sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and”, “or” and “not”, and the arithmetic operations of addition and subtraction from which multiplication and division can also be derived). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
Prior calculating technologies, had to rely on slower mechanical processes. This meant they were much more limited in speed, flexibility and adaptability. Nevertheless they too were designed to facilitate the same fundamental arithmetic and logical operations. The technologies of mathematics are in this sense much simpler than the elaborate analytic structures which make up mathematical analysis. And for this reason, it is not necessary to consider all of mathematics in order to follow much of the history of how the technologies to aid mathematical reasoning developed. Just considering the history of the development of aids to calculation can tell a great deal. It is that which is dealt with here.
We may consider a range of examples of these human aids to calculation as “stepping stones” laying out the path of their development. These show an unmistakeable progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The invention and design of technologies has shaped in major part on what they were to be used for. This raises a wider set of questions for this discussion. Clearly one important factor shaping the need for, role, and design of calculators has been the parallel developments in mathematical reasoning, which in various ways they have been made to assist.
So how much of this history of mathematical reasoning is necessary? Thankfully much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics need not be considered. For example, important though they are we do not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.24 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus need only be on a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science25 through to the sociology of science.26 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
As already noted, it will not be necessary to consider much of the huge corpus of extraordinary development in mathematics that have occurred over millennia. For example, important though they are we will not need to talk about the development of set and group theory, nor of the development by Hilbert of the mathematics of infinite dimensional vector space that made the modern formulation of quantum mechanics possible. Nor need we do we need to study the creation of the tensor theory which enabled Einstein in general relativity to write his wonderfully neat field equations for the shape of space time of this universe.27 It is sufficient to note that many modern challenges - from the prediction of climate under the stress of global warming, to the simulation of a nuclear reactor accident, to the deconstruction of DNA - could not occur without enormous numbers of calculations of addition and subtraction (multiplication and division) which can only be carried out in workable times with the use of ever faster calculating devices.
The focus here will thus be confined to a tiny simple bit of mathematics - and then primarily on the numerical calculation required to carry out practical applications of mathematical analysis. Yet oddly, it seems in doing so we come across many of the curly issues that we would have to think about if we were focussing on the whole evolving field of mathematical thought. The history of mathematics is itself a field of scholastic study which can be developed from many perspectives. These include those from the mainstream of philosophy and history of science28 through to the sociology of science.29 Even though this discussion here focuses on only a tiny “arithmetic core” to mathematics it will be important to at least take some account of this literature and its insights.
The question is important, but the answer is a bit more complex. First there is the question of what caused the developments in mathematics! It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. It might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but needed to develop new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
The question is simple enough, but the answer is less so. First it raises the question of what caused the developments in mathematics? It might be assumed that mathematics developed through a process that was entirely internal to itself. The development of mathematics might, for example, have occurred because people could ask questions which arose within what is known in mathematics, but required new mathematics to answer them. This is certainly part of the story. Yet the literature on history of mathematics tells us this cannot be all.
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to greater purchase in the broader society.
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to gain greater use in the broader society.
In relation to the collection of objects, for which this discussion forms a context, the content similarly breaks effectively into three major parts. The first part, which looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period, forms a backdrop, which important as it may be, does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. As for the collection, its objects are drawn in their entirety from what, in the above sense, can be considered the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early seventeenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to be adopted in the broader society.
Similarly the history here breaks into three parts. The first part, looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period. That forms a backdrop, but does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. The objects in this “collection Calculant” are drawn from the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early sixteenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to greater purchase in the broader society.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. Some of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). It is thus a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In this way the collection and the history it illustrates form a duet - where the two voices each tell part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. Some of the more recent of these (from the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). It is thus a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In this way the collection and the history it illustrates form a duet - where the two voices each tell part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant”.30 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “stepping stones: toward the end of calculators” title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant”.31 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “end of calculators” in the title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant”.32 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops.
The “stepping stones: toward the end of calculators” title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant”.33 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops. The “stepping stones: toward the end of calculators” title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant”34. This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops.
Welcome to “Calculant”.35 This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. Some of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is often called “collection Calculant”). It is thus a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In this way the collection and the history it illustrates form a duet - where the two voices each tell part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. Some of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is called “collection Calculant”). It is thus a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In this way the collection and the history it illustrates form a duet - where the two voices each tell part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
The title “stepping stones: toward the end of calculators” contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
The “stepping stones: toward the end of calculators” title hence contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
Welcome to “Calculant”36 - a site devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant”37. This is a site devoted to developing a perspective on the long history of calculation - from the development of counting, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into phones, tablets and laptops.
The title “stepping stones: toward the end of calculators” contains a deliberate ambiguity. It refers both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators.
The story here is based on a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. Some of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection (which for shortness is often called “collection Calculant”). It is thus a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In this way the collection and the history it illustrates form a duet - where the two voices each tell part of the story. The history has shaped what has been collected, and the collection has helped shape how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant”38 - a site devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant”39 - a site devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant” - the name given to this site40. The site is devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant”41 - a site devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant” - the name given to this site42. The site is devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant” - the name given to this site43. The site is devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to “Calculant” - the name given to this site44. The site is devoted to providing one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
(:title Stepping stones toward the end of calculators :)
(:title Stepping stones: toward the end of calculators :)
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (object) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (objective) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The title thus contains a deliberate ambiguity, referring both to the end (object) and end (final disappearance) of calculators. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
(:title Stepping stones towards the end of calculators :)
(:title Stepping stones toward the end of calculators :)
(:title Stepping stones to the end of calculators :)
(:title Stepping stones towards the end of calculators :)
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent progressive disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
The early personal calculators the 1980s gave birth to the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
The early personal calculators of the 1980s presaged the birth of the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
One thing is clear from this collection. Laid out, as it is, along a time-line there is an obvious progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the later devices. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of such instruments as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
The stepping stones along the path of the development of human aids to calculation show an obvious progression in complexity, sophistication and style from the earliest to the latest. Corresponding to this it is possible to construct histories of calculational aids as some sort of evolution based on solving technical problems with consequent improvements in design building one upon the other. But this strips away much that may be important in why they were invented and used.
This site is built around a personal collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. To understand the collection this essay sets those historical items against the history of calculation (starting before even the invention of writing, and stretching forward to the first personal electronic calculators). In fact, the devices that have been collected have very much been chosen to illustrate that history. That creates an interesting dynamic which gives both the collection and the history its own peculiar shape.
Welcome to Calculant. This site provides one perspective on the long history from the development of the human ability to count, to the invention of calculational tools, and to their subsequent disappearance into the converging world of electronic computerised phones, tablets and laptops. The story is of a series of stepping stones stretching back millenia. In this site many of the more recent of those (over the last 400 years) are drawn from a personal collection - a collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. In a way the collection and the history form a duet, where each tells part of the story with the history informing in part what is to be collected, and the collection in part shaping how the story is told.
To begin: As most people know following the early personal calculators the 1980s gave birth to the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). Of course on top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
The early personal calculators the 1980s gave birth to the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). On top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
(:title A collection & history: the development of mechanical calculation :)
(:title Stepping stones to the end of calculators :)
(:title A collection & history: the development of mechanical calculation :)
In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition45 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
In keeping with the analysis I have contributed to elsewhere (in a book by Joseph Camilleri and myself), human development, will roughly be divided into a set of semi-distinct (but overlapping) epochs, preceded by a “pre-Modern Era” spanning the enormous time period from the birth of the first modern homo-sapiens to the beginning of the “Modern Period”. This beginning is set as beginning (somewhat earlier than is conventional) in the middle of the sixteenth century, with the “Early Modern Period” continuing from the mid-sixteenth to late eighteenth century, and the “Late Modern Period” stretching forward into the twentieth century, and terminating around the two world wars. From thereon, the world is regarded by Joseph Camilleri and myself as entering a period of transition46 (but there is not much need to focus on that here).
Thr decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”47 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
The decision to apparently stretch the concept of calculator so far reflects a well known observation within the History and Philsophy of Science and Technology that in the end, technique and technology, or science and technology, are not completely distinct categories. Technologies embody knowledge, the development of technologies can press forward the boundaries of knowledge, and technological development is central to discovery in science. As Mayr says in one of many essays on the subject, “If we can make out boundaries at all between what we call science and technology, they are usually arbitrary.”48 Indeed, as will be described later, the mental image that mathematics is the work of mathematicians (‘thinkers’) whilst calculators are the work of artisans (‘practical working people’) is an attempt at a distinction that falls over historically, sociologically, and philosophically.
This site is built around a personal collection - of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. To understand the collection this essay sets those historical items against the history of calculation (starting before even the invention of writing, and stretching forward to the first personal electronic calculators). In fact, the devices that have been collected have very much been chosen to illustrate that history. That creates an interesting dynamic which gives both the collection and the history its own peculiar shape.
This site is built around a personal collection of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. To understand the collection this essay sets those historical items against the history of calculation (starting before even the invention of writing, and stretching forward to the first personal electronic calculators). In fact, the devices that have been collected have very much been chosen to illustrate that history. That creates an interesting dynamic which gives both the collection and the history its own peculiar shape.
1 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
2 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
3 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo ( calculare, calculavi) meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
4 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
5 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
6 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
7 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
8 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
9 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
10 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
11 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
12 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
13 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
14 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
15 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
16 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
17 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
18 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
19 Ernest Martin, The Calculating Machines (Die Rechenmaschinen), 1925, Translated and reprinted by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell and Michael R. Williams for the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for the History of Computing, Vol 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1992, p. 1. (↑)
20 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
21 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
22 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
23 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
24 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
25 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
26 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
27 See for example http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EinsteinFieldEquations.html or for more explanation http://physics.gmu.edu/~joe/PHYS428/Topic9.pdf (both viewed 26 Dec 2011) (↑)
28 See for example, Eleanor Robson, Jacqueline A. Stedall, The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics, Oxford University Press, UK, 2009 (↑)
29 See for example, Sal Restivo, Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1992 (↑)
30 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
31 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
32 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
33 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
34 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
35 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
36 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
37 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
38 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute” or more figuratively “they esteem” (↑)
39 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute”. (↑)
40 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute” or more figuratively “they esteem” (↑)
41 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute” or more figuratively “they esteem” (↑)
42 Calculant is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute” or more figuratively “they esteem” (↑)
43 “Calculant” is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute” or more figuratively “they esteem” (↑)
44 Calculant is the third-person plural present active indicative of the Latin verb calculo meaning “they calculate, they compute” or more figuratively “they esteem” (↑)
45 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
46 Joseph Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance Across a Stressed Planet, Edward Elgar, UK, 2009, pp. 132–45./ (↑)
47 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
48 Otto Mayr, “The science-technology relationship”, in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge USA, 1982, p.157. (↑)
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
« | History Contentsl | Part 1 Origins »
« | History Contents | Part 1 Origins »
« | HistoryTrail | Part 1 Origins »
« | History Contentsl | Part 1 Origins »
This site is built around a personal collection - of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. To understand the collection there is also an essay setting those historical items against the history of calculation (starting before even the invention of writing, and stretching forward to the first personal electronic calculators). In fact, the devices that have been collected have very much been chosen to illustrate that history. That creates an interesting dynamic which gives both the collection and the history its own peculiar shape.
This site is built around a personal collection - of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. To understand the collection this essay sets those historical items against the history of calculation (starting before even the invention of writing, and stretching forward to the first personal electronic calculators). In fact, the devices that have been collected have very much been chosen to illustrate that history. That creates an interesting dynamic which gives both the collection and the history its own peculiar shape.
A collection is like a puzzle. It can raise many questions without the need for a single word. But the opposite is also true. Framing interesting questions in relation to the objects in the collection may work best after some words of explanation. Bear with me, and I will try to illustrate what I mean with a metaphor.
Suppose you find yourself in a new land with which you are not yet very familiar. Trying to find your way forward you stumble across a strange dark place. There is a door which you open, and you enter. Inside it is so dark you cannot make out more than the beginning of a path. You take a few steps forward and on your left a light clicks on illuminating a glass case. In it is a pile of sand, but its purpose is unclear. As you walk on that light extinguishes and a new light illuminates another case. In it is a small group of stones. In the next, a rope with knots. In the next a clay object with symbols on it. In the next a set of beads on a string. In the next strange symbols scribed on a decaying yellowing material. Soon an assortment of devices with gears, dials, and various displays emerge.
You are puzzled. Retracing your steps in the gloom you find a dimly lit switch which, with some hesitation, you flick on. Now next to each case you see a softly illuminated picture. Each depicts the associated objects in use by one or more humans, although the use is not clear. One or two figures are naked. Most are dressed in clothing of different fabrics - some crude, others progressively more recognisably contemporary. You can also make out branching passage ways. Each is characterised by different figures, clothing and, not infrequently, ethnic features. Yet it is still really not clear what all this is about.
Getting to what seems to be the end of the display you see in the last case something you recognise. It is a pocket calculator. If this is about calculating then, perhaps this exhibition is intended as a history - perhaps of the developments in attempts to build devices to aid calculation - an effort brought effectively to a close during the abrupt transition to personal electronic mathematical calculators in the early 1970s. This seems a plausible explanation of the purpose of the display, but why these particular choices? Perhaps somewhere there is guide or catalogue that might provide more context and explanation?
What follows is one such guide for the collection assembled in this website. It is an attempt to provide some useful context and at least partial explanation of why the objects that are presented might be of interest.
This site is built around a personal collection - of the ever more peculiar machines and devices invented in the past to assist the very human task of calculating. To understand the collection there is also an essay setting those historical items against the history of calculation (starting before even the invention of writing, and stretching forward to the first personal electronic calculators). In fact, the devices that have been collected have very much been chosen to illustrate that history. That creates an interesting dynamic which gives both the collection and the history its own peculiar shape.
As most people know following the early personal calculators the 1980s gave birth to the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). Of course on top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
To begin: As most people know following the early personal calculators the 1980s gave birth to the personal computer. Before long, with every more sophisticated miniaturisation, these began to be embodied in an ever expanding array of converging devices, which in turn diffused ever greater computing power across the planet. However, however sophisticated these modern computers appeared on the outside, and whatever the diversity of functions they performed, at heart they achieved most of this by doing a few things extremely fast. (Central to the things they did were logic operations such as “if”, “and” and “not” and arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division ). Of course on top of this were layers of sophisticated programming, memory and input and output.
A discussion in two parts.
A discussion in three parts.
In relation to the collection of objects, for which this discussion forms a context, the content similarly breaks effectively into two major parts. The first part, which looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period, forms a backdrop, which important as it may be, does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. As for the collection, its objects are drawn in their entirety from what, in the above sense, can be considered the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early seventeenth century).
In relation to the collection of objects, for which this discussion forms a context, the content similarly breaks effectively into three major parts. The first part, which looks at the relationship between the evolution of calculating and calculators in the pre-Modern period, forms a backdrop, which important as it may be, does not refer at all to specific objects in the collection. As for the collection, its objects are drawn in their entirety from what, in the above sense, can be considered the Modern Period (the earliest of these objects being from the early seventeenth century), and the Late Modern Period (from 1800), when mechanical calculation began to be adopted in the broader society.
« | Part 1 Origins | Part 1 Origins »
« | HistoryTrail | Part 1 Origins »